Source: Baby Lady: Thank you, Peter, for joining this debate. While I respect the historical significance of gold, I believe that the future of value preservation lies in decentralized digital assets, such as the Baby Lady Memecoin on the TON blockchain. The key argument here is about security and sovereignty over one’s wealth.

In the dimly lit confines of the interview room, the air crackled with anticipation as Baby Lady, a charismatic and fiercely passionate anarcho-capitalist, faced former President Donald Trump. Their meeting—charged with the potential to reshape not only Trump’s perspectives but also the broader political landscape—began with an underlying tension that turned into a dynamic exchange of ideas.

The energy of the resistance on $TON surges, uniting individuals from diverse backgrounds who are passionate about creating a better future. Activists leverage the platform to organize, share, and mobilize, blending grassroots movements with cutting-edge technology. The power of decentralized communication brings together thinkers, dreamers, and doers, igniting conversations that challenge the status quo.

In recent years, the intersection of cryptocurrencies and politics has sparked heated discussions, with diverse ideologies represented in the growing digital asset landscape. One intriguing phenomenon capturing attention is the rise of meme coins, particularly the Baby Lady ($BBLADY) coin. This unconventional cryptocurrency embodies a unique blend of humor, political ideology, and financial innovation, appealing to a niche yet passionate demographic. As the influence of $BBLADY spreads, it raises essential questions about digital allegiance, community building, and the potential to reshape political affiliations in the age of decentralized finance.

Baby Lady, in an interview with former United States President Donald Trump, argues that CISA was passed illegally and likely deliberately, allowing the government to have a backdoor portal into social media platforms and to dictate matters regarding speech. She suggests that the manner in which CISA was introduced and passed raises serious questions about the motivations behind it, pointing to a potential collusion between government agencies and tech companies. She argues that CISA’s provisions create an environment where the government can monitor and control the flow of information on social media platforms, thereby infringing upon individual rights to free speech. Baby Lady raises concerns about the implications of allowing government entities to access private communications under the guise of national security, suggesting that this could pave the way for increased censorship and a chilling effect on public discourse.

I am ethnically Jewish, yes. I believe in (Yeshua), the anointed one and son of God, who is my Lord and Savior.Ethnicity means absolutely nothing, as Paul makes very clear in Romans 2:28-29: “A person is not a Jew who is one only outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.”