Candidate Lee Jae-myung's pledge is to establish fair market order and reconsider transparency in corporate governance. In particular, Lee promised to take strong measures against unfair practices such as stock price manipulation and market price manipulation.
The government plans to introduce a one-trickout system that restricts market participation if they participate in stock price manipulation even once, and to this end, it will strengthen the system for monitoring unfair trade such as stock price manipulation and strict criminal punishment.
Securing transparency in corporate governance was also suggested as a key pledge. First of all, he said he would push ahead with the revision of the commercial law to protect shareholder interests, which was canceled last month due to the exercise of veto power by then Acting President Han Duck-soo.
The goal is to revitalize the intensive voting system, which allows directors representing minority shareholders to be appointed to strengthen management monitoring functions, and to gradually expand the separate election of audit committee members.
It also promised to allocate new stock priorities to general shareholders of existing parent companies during the so-called "split listing," and institutionalize the listed companies' treasury stocks to be returned to shareholder profits by incineration in principle.
In addition, candidate Lee presented a mid- to long-term economic industry growth roadmap immediately after taking office and predicted that the implementation of a detailed roadmap for the inclusion of MSCI advanced countries' indices will open the 5,000-era KOSPI index in the long run.
Candidate Kim Moon-soo put forward the core content of easing investment regulations rather than improving the system for the stock market to boost corporate investment.
The president has lowered various regulations to global standard levels, and announced that he will hold a corporate briefing session for foreign investors. Tax reform that lowers the maximum corporate tax and inheritance tax rates was also included in the deregulation measures to boost investment.
Kim also pledged to provide tax incentives to long-term stockholders and funds to help form middle-class assets, and to support shareholder returns by separately taxing dividend income. Although he promised to abolish dividend income tax in the party's primary election last month, he adjusted the level of his pledge to submit to the election committee to separate taxation.
Candidate Kim also mentioned the introduction of a punitive damage compensation system for stock price manipulation and insider trading damage by announcing his "K-capital market" pledge during the party's primary, but was excluded from the representative pledge submitted to the NEC.
In addition, candidate Kim pledged to institutionalize the virtual asset market by enacting the Digital Asset Promotion Act and to allow virtual asset spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
In addition, pledges related to virtual assets stand out in the pledges of out-of-house political parties and independent candidates. Kwon Young-guk of the Democratic Labor Party pledged to immediately implement abolished financial investment income tax and virtual asset tax. The bill calls for taxing 30 percent of income generated from financial investment products such as stocks, bonds, funds, and derivatives as well as virtual assets.
Independent candidate Song Jin-ho made a key pledge to revitalize virtual assets. He pledged to establish a financial supervisory body dedicated to virtual assets and create public funds or relief funds to protect investors.
He first came up with a revision to the commercial law and then used the veto power, but this time, he seems to be not making a pledge.
I don't need to hear anything they say because Ilguion is a passive party,
Even that, there are many things that the Democratic Party is already pushing for with legislation.
Rep. Lee So-young is revising the dividend income tax law, and benefits for long-term holding funds are also in progress
It's from a previous meeting.
Even if you say something similar, one side explains why if you can't keep it,
One side just refuses and denies it at all, but I don't understand why they throw away the ticket on that side.
From the standpoint of investing even a small amount, the revision of the commercial law is the top concern in this presidential election.
I think the conclusion is already there.
