Fair?

By @swedishdragon12/2/2018goldenhourphotography
We are breed social beings. Our brains automatically calculaite the fairness of how financial rewards are distributed. Our brains have a happiness response to fair treatment and a dislike responce to unfairness. This brain wiring has implications for life happiness. We care not only about money/materialistic rewards, but also about respect, comitment & social status >Your perception of fair, differs depending on your culture, your personal values and preferences

47170911_1955650968076152_1421438788323770368_n.jpg

Presived fairness is-All is treated the same & all play by the same rules...And the once who work harder , is accepted to resive a greater share of the 'cake'

From a stand point of self -intresst, one would thiink, anyy thing over 0 would be considered a gain, if your work before getting the offer, is nill.
But our brain sees, the 100% reward as more intresting even if it will tip our fairness to a negative...
If you get a reward of 100% & have to split it in 2, anything less then 50% offer will be rejected by your brain AS half is what the brain considerers as fair..
EVEN if you made no work for it & you didinet have anything to start with...

The brains reward centras lit(ventral striatum, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex&ventromedial prefrontal cortex ). These areas are associated with automatic, intuitive reactions, rather than learned responses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAHixhpbwlw

The steem/bitcoin situation is unfair,but its not helpful to keep focusing on it. How about putting your energy on things you actually can control & by that, you will be rewarded for your work
This is my entry in @juliank’s GoldenHour Photography contest

Categoryphoto
SettingsISO 300 40mm f/5,6 1/300
CameraCanon EOS 77D
LensCanon EF S18-55mm f/4-5.6G
Location Sweden-Somewere
OwnerAll Rights reserved,original content by @swedishdragon

giphy (1).gif

[](https://steemit.com/qurator/@qurator/qurator-3-0-update-post-guidelines-or-registration-details-or-tier-changes)
63

comments