anarchy

Anarchy doesn’t mean chaos or disorder; it means freedom from an oppressive centralised authority with a monopoly on violence and force.

anarchy
The Monopoly of Violence
The idea of law, of actions being lawful or unlawful, or even more perversely legal or illegal, has culturally instilled emotional significance, which acts in general, contrary to our innate impulses; this generally prevents the acting out of revenge, the application of equitable reciprocation, and denies the preservation of the equanimity of the mind in exchange for the perception of defencelessness.
The power to act is subverted to the authority that holds the slave in subjugation, that master claims exclusive use of violence, the slave who acts in equitable revenge, or with the equitable reciprocation of violence must answer for their conduct. So for example if an agent of the subjugating authority acts violently against another living soul that violence has no relief, to act in reciprocation of that violence results in escalation of violence by the imposed authority, ultimately in many cases to the murder of the slave. This transferal of the use of violence from the living soul leaves them open to further extortion through granted privilege; the subjugating authority grants privilege to legal entities to act against the individual, the community or the natural environment for their mutual advantage.
If violence were used to prevent such extortion, or to punish such conduct, then such violence would not indicate a danger to a reasonable soul, but merely a reaction to inequity or the threat or use of violence from agents of a subjugating authority.
“I believe in the brotherhood of man, all man, but I don’t believe in brotherhood with anybody who doesn’t want brotherhood with me. I believe in treating people right, but I’m not going to waste my time trying to treat somebody right who doesn’t know how to return the treatment.” Malcolm X

Reciprocity– Community Without Hierarchy
Hierarchy originates from Greek ‘hierarchía’ meaning “the rule or power of the high priest”, and functions upon the removal of reciprocity and the creation of authority, privilege, monopoly and rank, and produces excess for a minority and comparative scarcity for the majority.
Reciprocity is the innate equity of nature, from Latin ‘reciprocus’ meaning “returning the same way, alternating”.
The principle of reciprocity is the highest good encouraging goodness and decency, creating balance and harmony. Reciprocity is a free exchange of the equivalent or balanced action between living souls or living souls and nature, conceptualised as:

Don’t take more than you need.
Give at least as much as you get.
One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself. (Positive form of Golden Rule)
One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated. (Negative form of Golden Rule)

This concept describes a “reciprocal”, or “two-way”, relationship between one’s self and other souls or life, that involves both sides equally, and in a mutual fashion. This reciprocal nature then demands the axiom of non-aggression, that the wanton act of violence is without rationalisation, for example to destroy life simply to amass a fiction of property, pecuniary wealth, hoarded resources is an act of wanton aggression against all.

The Natural Freedom of Self-Determination
This is the capacity to make decisions without interference, obstruction, restriction or intervention from any other, for example to intentionally conceal the truth prevents another from an act of finding out or ascertaining something based upon all the evidence, as a result of investigation or research that is obstructed through the occulting of truth, the destruction, burying or seizure of evidence, or the creation of fabrications dressed up as truth to intentionally misdirect, confuse or cast doubt upon the reality of a situation.
The innate freedom of Self-realisation is freedom from external coercion, every living soul must ‘not’ be prevented from the fulfilment of their potentials, being the capacity to develop, succeed, or become something they desire or strive to become or achieve. For example hierarchical structures of control stand in direct opposition to self-realisation as they function upon subjugation, authority and imposition.
Epicurus said “..some things happen of necessity, others by chance, others through our own agency. …necessity destroys responsibility and chance is uncertain; whereas our own actions are autonomous, and it is to them that praise and blame naturally attach.” This being the case, free-will is in fact self-determination and self-realisation!
psychopaths
The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of us.
We must establish the substantive model and ignore the constructive, refuse to allow psychopaths any involvement in that independent structure, one that does not require hierarchy, only each soul accepting responsibility for their actions, and all fully accountable through a system of dispute arbitrations that applies universally and equally to all.
The predators fear the truth, they fear the approaching apocalypse: apocalypse means, ‘a disclosure of knowledge, i.e., a lifting of the veil or revelation’.

Slavery- The state of subjugation and control held upon you, of a master owning the fruits of your severe toils and drudgery, in exchange for the ‘benefits’ you receive from your disadvantage.
At what point are you then a slave; in America of the 19th century the slave imported from Africa by the Jewish merchants were forced to give their labours and received the benefit of their food, shelter, clothes and medical care.
The master slave structure of modern business gives far less, many work and cannot afford even the basics afforded the 19th century slaves. At what point does the surrender of the fruits of your labours against the benefits you receive for those labours stop being slavery?

Constructive Laws Versus Substantive Arbitration
A duty of care is a reciprocal obligation as an inherent burden on every individual, which requires they adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others; this is an implicit responsibility held by individuals towards others. To seek relief of a harm inflicted by another, it must be a “reasonably foreseeable” result of the conduct of the one blamed.
The State courts act as courts of the ‘corpse’; this is done to remove the duty of care and hold individuals extorted, unable to seek or establish relief of tort or dispute, in dichotomy to that is the court of the living. All courts as their true reason for existence have no other purpose than to arbitrate disputes between living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima), and the desire to limit exercise of the inherent power of the individual and avoid the duty of care that is a reciprocal obligation and responsibility of every living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima), is the true function of the fictions applied in the court of the corpse.anarchistsrealists
Rights
We now suffer a culture of entitlement based upon rights; rights are an extension of a grant (unattested), a grant is to believe without witness a superior will give a benefit or privilege, as benefits under a government (government means-mind control – govern mental); to give (a person or thing) a title, right, or claim to something; furnish a person or thing with grounds for laying claim. A ‘Right’ means a just claim (superiors grant), ‘to cry out justly’ to an authority if that granted right is denied or infringed; but only slaves have masters and can be granted privilege known as rights.
We must move away from ideas of entitlements such as rights and claims based in external authority, to ideas of equitable relief through redressing a wrong to heal, and witnessed actions, self-declared and local community based.
We must understand and apply our ‘Inherent power’ which is an authority possessed without it being derived from another; being our true reciprocal obligation and responsibility to others, or ability, or faculty of doing a thing, without receiving that as a perceived right, or ability, or faculty granted from another.
The sheep of society will battle fiercely for their ‘rights’, granted by the abasing upon their victim. You could not have a natural “right”, you always have inherent power, rights are used to obviate the inherent.
However in all other languages, what we call the law is denoted by a term signifying RIGHT: Latin by JUS: in the German by RECHT: in the French by DROIT: in Italian by DIRITTO etc.
All those terms denoting ‘rights’ apply to grants from a superior authority, so fundamentally equal to the policy of a landlord but as grants instead of dictates, therefore all represent a positive law model, clearly law and rights could never bind a free living soul as all living souls are equal as an innate natural state, to have a superior authority can only be imposed through force or the threat of force upon those viewed as slaves.
Courts
The original purpose of all courts was to act as a medium of arbitration to give equitable relief from dispute or tortious actions between living souls (inventivum anima), it would be impossible to impose corporate policy upon a living soul, it can only be impose upon an incorporated legal fiction, an incorporeal entity; they could never impose a superior authority on a living soul, in any reasoned way, as it is an affront to the innate inherent power of every living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima).
This invented and imposed corporate policy now dominates the courts, based upon a superior authority of unnatural function, ratified by the fiction of collective ‘right’.
That imposition can be only upon those held in citizen-ship, the vessel of their enslavement, both economic and mental, they are the slave upon their vessel, and the owner of that ship grants them rights of conduct; that is a power, privilege, faculty, or demand, inherent in one person and incident upon another, the correlative of ‘duty’ or ‘obligation’, granted from a superior authority to an inferior man or woman.
Positive law is authoritatively imposed; meaning without being imposed through force or implied force, these laws would in the main be ignored as they are unnatural, and function in general to maintain monopoly, usury, privilege and criminal advantage; so only by positive enforcement it is policy of law; all ‘law’ being the imposed authority of the ‘Lord’ owning the land and all upon it, and all rights being a granted concession or appropriation of that authority.
This is why citizen-‘ships’ are held in the dock of a court, and the landlord’s agents, sworn under oath as such, of judge, magistrate, lawyer, barrister, solicitor and attorney arbitrates which ship in dispute must pay the landlord.
In contrast ‘Terrente relief’ allows anyone who is harmed to relief, or who is cheated or robbed to recover their loss. Terrente relief is not positive law, as it’s victim determined, and initiated, as it is based on protection of the individual and not imposition; there are many positive law systems in place that are designed and intended to only be applied to a ‘slave’, turning a man into an object of trade, through the straw man of corporation, which is a fictional state imposed by force or implied force, and not a natural state of a free man or woman.
Policy Enforcement
In the early history of England, within the corporate trust court system of constructed legal fictions the victim of a crime (breach of corporate policy) and his family had the granted right to hire a private attorney to prosecute criminal charges against the person (fictional legal construct of a straw man) alleged to have injured the victim. In the 18th century prosecution of almost all criminal offences in England were private, usually by the victim, not until the invention and imposition of the modern corporate policy enforcers (police) was a monopoly installed by the Crown Corporation to protect its agent from prosecution by controlling and restricting those who could be brought to justice through their system.
Abdun Nur